Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Cancer Cytopathol ; 129(7): 548-554, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1086319

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the cytopathology workload has decreased remarkably worldwide as all screening and elective procedures have been postponed to prioritize the clinical management of patients at high oncological risk. In the current study, the authors provide data on the lasting impact of COVID-19 on cytopathology practice during the initial phases of the Italian postlockdown period. METHODS: The percentages of the cytological sample types processed at the University of Naples Federico II during the first 12 weeks of the Italian postlockdown period were compared with those of the same period in 2019. The study period was divided into four 3-week periods. Differences in the rates of malignant diagnoses were also assessed. RESULTS: During the 12-week study period, the overall cytological sample workload decreased by 41.6% in comparison with 2019. In particular, the workload significantly declined for each sample type: Pap smears, -33.3%; urine, -42.8%; serous fluids, -14.4%; thyroid, -54.5%; breast, -43%; lymph node, -27.3%; and salivary gland, -61%. By contrast, the overall malignancy rate was significantly increased (P = .0011). CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in the cytological sample workload during the postlockdown period still represents an ongoing effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, the rise in the overall malignancy rate reflects the importance of prioritizing diagnostic procedures for patients at high oncological risk.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cytodiagnosis/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/statistics & numerical data , Breast/pathology , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Salivary Glands , Thyroid Gland , Workload
2.
Endocrine ; 71(1): 20-25, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-962158

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Nowadays, the clinical management of thyroid nodules needs to be multi-disciplinary. In particular, the crosstalk between endocrinologists and cytopathologists is key. When FNAs are properly requested by endocrinologists for nodules characterised by relevant clinical and ultrasound features, cytopathologists play a pivotal role in the diagnostic work-up. Conversely, improper FNA requests can lead to questionable diagnostic efficiency. Recently, recommendations to delay all non-urgent diagnostic procedures, such as thyroid FNAs, to contain the spread of COVID-19 infection, have made the interplay between endocrinologists and cytopathologists even more essential. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on our practice by evaluating the total number of FNAs performed and the distribution of the Bethesda Categories before, during, and after the lockdown. METHODS: We analysed the FNA trends before (1st January 2019 to March 13th 2020), during (March 14th to May 15th), and after (May 16th to July 7th) the lockdown. RESULTS: Although the total number of weekly FNAs dropped from 62.1 to 23.1, our referring endocrinologists managed to prioritise patients with high-risk nodules. In fact, in the post-lockdown, the weekly proportion of benign diagnoses dropped on average by 12% and that of high-risk diagnoses increased by 6%. CONCLUSIONS: The lesson we have learned so far from this pandemic is that by applying safety protocols to avoid contagion and by increasing the threshold for FNA requests for thyroid nodules, we can continue to guarantee our services to high-risk patients even in times of a health crisis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility , Pandemics , Quarantine , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Attitude to Health , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/statistics & numerical data , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/trends , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Female , Guideline Adherence/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/trends , Health Priorities/standards , Health Priorities/statistics & numerical data , Health Priorities/trends , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Health Services Accessibility/trends , History, 21st Century , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Quarantine/organization & administration , Quarantine/standards , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/trends , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Nodule/epidemiology , Time Factors , Ultrasonography, Interventional
3.
Cancer Cytopathol ; 128(12): 885-894, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-893212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on cytopathology practices worldwide has not been investigated formally. In the current study, data from 41 respondents from 23 countries were reported. METHODS: Data regarding the activity of each cytopathology laboratory during 4 weeks of COVID-19 lockdown were collected and compared with those obtained during the corresponding period in 2019. The overall number and percentage of exfoliative and fine-needle aspiration cytology samples from each anatomic site were recorded. Differences in the malignancy and suspicious rates between the 2 periods were analyzed using a meta-analytical approach. RESULTS: Overall, the sample volume was lower compared with 2019 (104,319 samples vs 190,225 samples), with an average volume reduction of 45.3% (range, 0.1%-98.0%). The percentage of samples from the cervicovaginal tract, thyroid, and anorectal region was significantly reduced (P < .05). Conversely, the percentage of samples from the urinary tract, serous cavities, breast, lymph nodes, respiratory tract, salivary glands, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, liver, and biliary tract increased (P < .05). An overall increase of 5.56% (95% CI, 3.77%-7.35%) in the malignancy rate in nongynecological samples during the COVID-19 pandemic was observed. When the suspicious category was included, the overall increase was 6.95% (95% CI, 4.63%-9.27%). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a drastic reduction in the total number of cytology specimens regardless of anatomic site or specimen type. The rate of malignancy increased, reflecting the prioritization of patients with cancer who were considered to be at high risk. Prospective monitoring of the effect of delays in access to health services during the lockdown period is warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Laboratories, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pathology, Clinical/statistics & numerical data , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Laboratories, Hospital/trends , Pathology, Clinical/trends , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
4.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 44(5): 1065-1073, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-739704

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We compared demographic and clinic-pathological variables related to the number of surgeries for thyroid conditions or for cancer, morbidity, and fine needle aspiration (FNA) practices among Covid19 pandemic phases I, II, III and the same seasonal periods in 2019. METHODS: The prospective database of the Division of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China was used for this study. Covid19 emergency levels were stratified according to the World Health Organization: phase I (January 25-February 25, 2020), phase II (February 26-March 19), phase III (March 20-April 20). RESULTS: There were fewer outpatient FNAs and surgeries in 2020 than in 2019. There were no thyroid surgeries during phase I. There were also fewer surgeries for cancer with a significant reduction of advanced stage cancer treatments, mainly stage T1b N1a in phase II and T3bN1b in phase III. Operative times and postoperative stays were significantly shorter during the pandemic compared to our institutional baseline. In phase III, vocal cord paralysis (VCP) increased to 4.3% of our baseline numbers (P = 0.001). There were no cases of Covid19-related complications during the perioperative period. No patients required re-admission to the hospital. CONCLUSION: The Covid19 outbreak reduced thyroid surgery patient volumes. The decrease of Covid19 emergency plans contributed to unexpected outcomes (reduction of early stage cancer treatment, decreased operative times and hospital stays, increased VCP rate).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Thyroid Diseases/surgery , Thyroid Gland/surgery , Adult , Aged , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/statistics & numerical data , China , Female , Humans , Iran , Italy , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries/epidemiology , Republic of Korea , Thyroid Diseases/pathology , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Thyroidectomy/adverse effects , Vocal Cord Paralysis/epidemiology , Vocal Cord Paralysis/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL